Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hello, me again… I finally decided to not use my “30 day money back guarantee”, because most probably it only would have been quite some wasted time to argue why the EAs weren’t profitable (although I can show you plenty of proof), and to be honest I still hope that I will get some value from money…. What’s really annoying me, however, is the negligence/ignorance of the owners/admins of this forum to be honest… Many people – and most of them paid quite a lot of money for the services of this site – make comments/make suggestions (sometimes even good ones), ask questions… but still Petko and his team seem to just give a sh**, because there is no reply, there is no answer, or maybe – if you are lucky – only many weeks later… I really don’t understand that… Why is it so difficult to say: “Well, XY, thank you for your suggestion, but for XXX we don’t think it’s possible to implement this feature” or “Well, YX, thanks for your interest, we just think your suggestion is really stupid, because….” or “Geez, thanks for your comment, but we don’t comment on any comment….” or something like that – I JUST DON’T GET IT!!!!
Maybe it’s just me, but I am struggling a bit with the pace new robots are added and are replacing robots that previously were – often for a long time – in the “Top 10″… Especially the latest addition of new time frames meant that robots that were in the top 10 often for weeks or months are now “worthless” (u know what I mean)…? A good feature would be a “Manage Only” function in the variables of an EA; when activated the EA should only manage currently open positions, but not open any new ones. At the moment it is recommended (at least as far as I understood) to just close open positions when a robot should be replaced, but very often these robots are in drawdown and therefore need to be closed with a loss… With the feature proposed the bot at least has a chance to close open positions in profit without the need to monitor it permanently….
Same here, download not possible despite a valid lifetime subscription for FX pairs… Also – while I appreciate that a new pair was added, I don’t really understand why AUD or CAD pairs are not considered at all but instead another JPY pair was chosen…
Hello Alan, thanks a lot for your reply, for sure I am following your posts, much appreciated. I am following a similar approach (testing various strategies regarding the Top 10 App), but currently all with negative results (as yours). That being said, I really want to hear from the sellers of this App – what do they think regarding the current negative results, what are their plans for the future, are there any amendmens/improvements planned etc. Unfortunately, in the latest videos on YouTube I only see Petko trying to sell useless EAs from FXAutomater for affiliate commissions, sorry to say, but that just is my impression…
Hello @Marin (or any other admins of this forum, if there are any….) – why is there no response from your side at all to these requests? Can you please enlighten the community and me what are your further plans? Why do you not offer more FX pairs as I suggested, what improvements do you plan in the near future? As mentionned in another thread, I am still in my 30 days testing period, only with negative results so far, so if I have the impression that this Top 10 App project will not be improved in the future I really think I will use the 30 days money-back-guarantee, as I don’t see really any commitment from you, the developpers, currently… Sorry about my frustration, but I paid quite some money for the App and I really would like if this works…
I am really disappointed that this forum is so “dead” here… Does anyone really have success with the FX-Robots from the Top 10 App, and if yes with what approach/strategy???
I bought it about 2 weeks ago and I am trying various options (like put all EAs in one account, add new ones regularly, track the performance, use only the best ones for another account or use the Top 5 from 1M and change it regularly or use only EAs that are Top 5 both in 1Y and 1M, etc.), but to be honest every strategy so far is negative, with way more losers than winners…
Maybe 2 weeks indeed is too short, but should there not be any improvement in performance I guess I will use the 30-days money-back-guarantee, as the promise is that these EAs are profitable…
Hello, I saw that there are a few really good suggestions made by other users, is there any follow-up?
Especially this one bothers me as well (was made in May; a solution would enhance the user experience A LOT):
-Would it be possible for the magic numbers of the individual EAs be coped to the portfolio mode? This will let us track the top performers weekly and compare against the dashboard best EAs. Currently when you export in portfolio mode it creates its own magic number making it hard to compared against the dashboard top performers.Another request – would it be possible to add some other currency pairs like with AUDCAD, GBPAUD, USDCAD? This would make it possible to trade less correlated pairs like EURUSD and AUDCAD simultaneously for a even better portfolio diversification imho…